Purification and Peace: The Role of Manyanggar Ritual in Dayak Folklore and Social Cohesion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v15i1.825

Keywords:

Plague Folklore, Social Resilience, Articulatory Labor, Conflict Resolution

Abstract

This study examines the Manyanggar ritual practiced by the Dayak Bakumpai community in Central Kalimantan as a mechanism for social resilience and conflict resolution. Two research questions guide the inquiry: (1) How does Manyanggar function as a symbolic medium for reinforcing social cohesion? (2) In what ways do community members interpret it as a conflict resolution tool? Drawing on an ethnographic approach, the study integrates in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis conducted during fieldwork in 2018. Findings demonstrate that Manyanggar operates as a ritual of purification and symbolic communication, facilitating social bonding and the negotiation of cultural and religious identities. Drawing on symbolic interactionism and Alatas's concept of articulatory labor, the study examines how Manyanggar has evolved within an Islamic moral framework while preserving its indigenous social functions. These findings contribute to broader scholarly discussions on indigenous knowledge systems, vernacular Islamization, and the role of ritual performance in contemporary peacebuilding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alanuari. (2022). Otoritas agama dari akar rumput Islam Indonesia [Book review]. Islam Nusantara: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture, 3(1).

Alatas, I. F. (2021). What is religious authority? Cultivating Islamic communities in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.

Anshori, M. A. (2013). Pemetaan resolusi konflik di Lampung. LP2M IAIN Raden Intan.

Asmawati, Normuslim, Abubakar, H. M., & Wahyudi. (2018). Makna pengobatan tradisional Badewah suku Dayak bagi masyarakat Muslim di Kalimantan Tengah. Religio: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v8i1.740

Blumer, H. (1968). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.

Boulanger, C. L. (2002). Inventing tradition, inventing modernity: Dayak identity in urban Sarawak. Asian Ethnicity, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14631360220132745

Brunvand, J. H. (Ed.). (1996). American folklore: An encyclopedia. Garland Publishing.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.

Danandjaja, J. (1997). Folklor Indonesia: Ilmu gosip, dongeng dan lain-lain. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Darmono, Sofyan, A., Wahyu, & Warni, H. (2013). Indigenous knowledge of Dayaks Bakumpai in Barito Kuala District on the management of plant diversity growing at streams and swamps. Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20527

/jwem.v1i1.97

Dewa Agung, G. A., Nasih, A. M., Sumarmi, Idris, & Kurniawan, B. (2024). Local wisdom as a model of interfaith communication in creating religious harmony in Indonesia. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, Article 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.

2024.100827

Diab, A. L., Pabbajah, M., Widyanti, R. N., Muthalib, L. M., & Widyatmoko, W. F. (2022). Accommodation of local wisdom in conflict resolution of Indonesia's urban society. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 2153413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2153413

Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

Eliade, M. (2002). Mitos gerakan kembali yang abadi: Kosmos dan sejarah [The myth of the eternal return: Cosmos and history] (C. Ananta, Trans.). Ikon Teralitera.

Fanselow, F. (2014). Indigenous and anthropological theories of ethnic conflict in Kalimantan. Zinbun, 45.

Fisher, S., Abdi, D. I., Ludin, J., Smith, R., Williams, S., & Williams, S. (2001). Mengelola konflik: Keterampilan dan strategi untuk bertindak. SMK Grafika Desa Putra.

Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (Eds.). (1980). Culture, media, language. Hutchinson.

Hartatik. (2017). Jejak budaya Dayak Meratus dalam perspektif etnoreligi. Penerbit Ombak.

Hobsbawm, E. J., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (2013). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.

Kriesberg, L. (1998). Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. Rowman and Littlefield.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (2005). Antropologi struktural [Anthropologie structurale] (N. R. Sjams, Trans.). Kreasi Wacana.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Muhadjir, N. (2002). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Rake Sarasin.

Nasrullah. (2014). The Islamic tradition of Bakumpai Dayak people. Jurnal Al-Albab, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v3i1.93

Nasrullah. (2017). The Dayak: Close to the eyes, far from the heart. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: Vol. 147. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Science Education (ICSSE). Atlantis Press.

Noviani, R. (2002). Jalan tengah memahami iklan: Antara realitas, representasi dan simulasi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Pamungkas, C., & Indriasari, D. T. (2021). Preventing religious conflict in Papua Land: Adopting cultural traditions of peacebuilding. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 9(2), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.18588/202108.00a119

Poloma, M. M. (2004). Sosiologi kontemporer. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ratini, N. M. (2015). Upacara Manyanggar Mamapas Lewu menurut masyarakat Hindu Kaharingan di Kelurahan Rantau Pulut Kabupaten Seruyan. Jurnal Belom Bahadat, 5(2).

Riduan, M., Putro, H. P. N., Sriwati, & Zakaria, N. B. (2024). Socio-religious values in the Manyanggar Banua ceremony in the Barikin Sungai Tengah Hulu Selatan community Kalimantan, Indonesia. IBDA': Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya, 22(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v22i1.10742

Safitri, A. (2022). Class journal: Approaches to interreligious studies: Leadership in the face of religion. Interreligious Studies UGM Graduate School. https://icrs.ugm.ac.id/2022/04/28/class-journal-approaches-to-interreligious-studies-leadership-in-the-face-of-religion/

Salendra, I. W. (2021). Philosophical values of the Manyanggar Lewu ceremony. Widya Katambung, 1(1), 1–10. https://ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/WK/article/view/216

Samiah, S. (1998). Upacara Manyanggar di Kecamatan Lahei Kabupaten Barito Utara. Fakultas Ushuluddin IAIN Antasari.

Singarimbun, M. (1991). Beberapa aspek kehidupan masyarakat Dayak. Jurnal Humaniora, 3.

Sobary, M. (2016). Perlawanan politik dan puitik petani tembakau Temanggung. KPG.

Sobur, A. (2003). Semiotika komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Subiantoro, S. (2010). Antropologi seni rupa: Teori, metode dan contoh telaah analitis. UNS Press.

Sukti, A. (2023). The Manyanggar tradition and harmony of the Bakumpai Dayak community in Central Kalimantan. El-Mashlahah, 13(2), 123–135. https://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/maslahah/article/view/3663

Sulistyati, M. (2022). Otoritas keislaman di Indonesia: Sebuah pembacaan ulang. Studia Islamika, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v29il.24649

Suporahardjo. (2000). Inovasi penyelesaian sengketa pengelolaan sumber daya hutan. Pustaka LATIN.

Tanggok, I., & Hawari, M. R. (2021). The traditional religion of the Dayak in West Kalimantan: Analysis of J.U. Lontaan's monograph. Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage, 10(1).

West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2009). Pengantar teori komunikasi: Analisis dan aplikasi (M. N. D. Maer, Trans.). Salemba Humanika.

Wirawan. (2010). Konflik dan manajemen konflik: Teori, aplikasi, dan penelitian. Salemba Humanika.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2026

How to Cite

Purification and Peace: The Role of Manyanggar Ritual in Dayak Folklore and Social Cohesion. (2026). Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage, 15(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v15i1.825