Why did Aceh lose its Nineteenth Century Independence? Comparisons with Siam and other states

Authors

  • Anthony John S. Reid Australian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v5i2.219

Keywords:

Aceh, Siam, Archipelago, Dutchs, British

Abstract

By the middle of the 19th century fully independent states in Southeast Asia were few, and all felt threatened by the advance of competitive European imperialisms. By 1900 only Siam (Thailand) had retained its full formal independence, though arguably by yielding key levers of control to the British. Siam’s success is often compared with the failure of Burma and Vietnam, conquered by Britain and France respectively in the late 19th century. Archipelago states have seldom entered this comparison, although Aceh had unique advantages in the ability to play off British and Dutch. The argument here is that the Aceh leadership did have vital agency, and made some crucial choices that could be considered mistakes from a Siam perspective. Dutch and British choices and mistakes have been better studied, but Acehnese ones also deserve to be.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1978. "Studies of the Thai State: the state of Thai studies", in The State of Thai Studies: Analyses of Knowledge, Approaches, and Prospects in Anthropology, Art History, Economics, History, and Political Science, edited by E. Ayal. Athens: Ohio University Southeast Asia Program, pp. 193–247.

Anderson, John. 1840. Acheen, and the Ports on the North and East Coasts of Sumatra. London: J. Robson.

Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Pongpaichit. 2009. A History of Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed.

Casale, Giancarlo. 2005. "His Majesty’s Servant Lutfi: The career of a previously unknown sixteenth-century Ottoman envoy to Sumatra based on an account of his travels from the Topkapi Palace archives." Turcica 37: 43-81.

Forrest, Thomas. 1792. A Voyage from Calcutta to the Mergui Archipelago. London: J. Robson.

Hall, D.G.E. 1968. A History of South-East Asia. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.

Jackson, Peter. 2007. "Autonomy and Subordination in Thai History: the case for semicolonial analysis." Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Vol. 8: 3, pp. 329-48.

Kadi, Ismail Hakki. 2015. "The Ottomans and Southeast Asia Prior to the Hamidian Era: A Critique of Colonial Perceptions of Ottoman-Southeast Asian Interaction", in From Anatolia to Aceh: Ottomans, Turks and Southeast Asia, edited by A.C.S. Peacock and Annabel Teh Gallop. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.

Kadi, Ismail Hakki, Andrew Peacock, and Annabel Teh Gallop. 2011A. "Writing History; The Acehnese embassy to Istanbul, 1849-1852", in Mapping the Acehnese Past, edited by Michael Feener, Patrick Daly, and Anthony Reid. Leiden: KITLV, pp. 259-178.

Kadi, Ismail Hakki, Andrew Peacock, and Annabel Teh Gallop. 2011B. "Texts, transliterations and translations of the letters discussed in 'Writing History; The Acehnese embassy to Istanbul, 1849-1852'", in Mapping the Acehnese Past, edited by Michael Feener, Patrick Daly, and Anthony Reid. Leiden: KITLV, pp. 163-182.

Kemp, P.H. van der. 1900. "Raffles’ Atjeh-overeenkomst van 1819." Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land-, en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsche-Indië 51: 83-92.

Koizumi, Junko. 2009. "Between Tribute and Treaty: Sino-Siamese Relations from the Late Nineteenth Century to the Early Twentieth Century", in Negotiating Asymmetry: China’s Place in Asia, edited by Anthony Reid & Zheng Yangwen. Singapore: NUS Press, pp. 47-72.

Lee Kam Hing. 1995. The Sultanate of Aceh: Relations with the British 1760-1824. Kuala Lumpur: OUP.

Lee Kam Hing. 2006. "Aceh at the time of the 1824 Treaty", in Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem. Singapore: NUS Press, pp. 72-95.

Marks, Harry. 1959. "The First Contest for Singapore, 1819-1824." Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut 27.

Moreno, Celso Cesar. 1873. "Acheen. The Sultan’s Minister Sketches the Country." New York Herald, 16 May 1873, p. 5.

Portman, M.V. 1899. A History of our Relations with the Andamanese. Calcutta: Government Printer.

Reid, Anthony. 1969. The Contest for North Sumatra. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Reid, Anthony. 1969A. "Sixteenth-century Turkish influence in western Indonesia." Journal of Southeast Asian History 10: 395-414.

Reid, Anthony. 2005. An Indonesian Frontier: Acehnese and other Histories of Sumatra. Singapore: NUS Press.

Reid, Anthony. 2014. "Turkey as Aceh’s Alternative Imperium." Archipel 87: 81-102.

Reid, Anthony. 2015. A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads. Malden/Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.

Tarling, Nicholas. 1957. "British Policy in the Malay Peninsula and Archipelago, 1824-1871." JMBRAS 30.

Tarling, Nicholas. 1962. Anglo-Dutch Rivalry in the Malay World, 1780-1824. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.

Trocki, Carl. 2007. Prince of Pirates: The Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore, 1784-1885. Singapore: NUS Press.

Vecoli, Rudolph, and Francesco Durante. 2014. Oh Capitano! La vita favolosa di Cesare Moreno in quattro continenti, 1831-1901. Venezia: Marsilio.

Woltring, J. ed. 1962. Bescheiden Betreffende de Buitenlandse Politiek van Nederland, Vol I (1871-4). The Hague: Rijks Geshiedkundige Publicatiën.

Wyatt, David. 1982. Thailand: A Short History. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-20

How to Cite

Why did Aceh lose its Nineteenth Century Independence? Comparisons with Siam and other states. (2017). Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage, 5(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v5i2.219

Similar Articles

1-10 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.